Search for: "United States v. Baker"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
” In all, there were “more than seventy legislative and congressional reapportionment lawsuits filed in forty states in the aftermath of Baker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:27 pm
The parties' briefs are available here; the brief of the United States is available here. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 10:12 am
” Eventually the issue came before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:45 am
President of the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Baker is sustained, adopted, and incorporated herein.U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
BLAG moved to dismiss the complaint stating that Baker v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:49 pm
Baker [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:20 am
United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:18 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:24 am
Takara, Senior Airman (E-4), United States Air Force, Petitioners v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:40 pm
Wrote Whatley, "In interpreting the Full Faith and Credit Clause, the United States Supreme Court has held that '[a] final judgment in one State, if rendered by a court with adjudicatory authority over the subject matter and persons governed by the judgment, qualifies for recognition throughout the land," citing Baker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:02 am
The Court’s opinion in Baker Botts v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Honeywell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
” A new world was dawning in the United States as well, King said, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]