Search for: "United States v. Ball" Results 301 - 320 of 859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 11:40 am
Yesterday was the 50th anniversary of the day in 1963 when the United State Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling of Brady v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am by Betty Lupinacci
  Fleer sought to have this case removed from the Chancery Court of Delaware to the United States District Court claiming original jurisdiction, but the case was remanded back to the Chancery Court (547 F.Supp. 102 (1982).) [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
In 2010 in the case of Mackay and BBC Scotland v The United Kingdom the European Court of Human Rights was critical of the informal procedure which had been adopted in Scotland up to that point which allowed orders to be made and then become final if the media made no challenge within 48 hours. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Stein
Ball State University, Mutual Pharmaceutical Company v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
The treatise is the standard reference in antitrust and the common-law nature of antitrust in the United States makes the treatise particularly influential. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:46 am by Mi Patente
The idea of negotiating an international treaty to fight in an urgent way the worldwide increasing piracy and counterfeiting is attributed to the United States and Japan. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 11:01 pm
The products of Acushnet at issue:Callaway sued Acushnet for patent infringement on February 9, 2006, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:49 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court recently elucidated the structure of the required analysis in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc v Bruen (2022). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:04 am by Lisa Whittaker
Ball State University (which we blogged on here), the United States Supreme Court finished employees off with the 5-4 decision in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 3:28 am
Although the data was not limited to the United States, "it is reasonable to infer that a substantial portion of active accounts holders are based in the United States, particularly in light of the fact that Opposer is a U.S. [read post]