Search for: "United States v. Barnett" Results 301 - 320 of 507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2020, 5:56 am
Hence the WTO should take a more demanding approach towards standards.Chapter 2 “Government use of the standards in the United States and abroad” (abroad means EU) analyses the standardisation process from the perspective of the involvement of governmental bodies in the process. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’  We had posts about this by Steve Barnett and Martin Moore. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, David Spinoza Tanenhaus, ed., Gale, 2008).Amelia J. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:34 pm by Allie
  It has been rendered the solemn duty of the Supreme Court of the United States, laid upon it by Congress in pursuance of the Federal Government’s power to regulate Commerce with foregin Nations, and among the several states, U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:42 am by Robert J. Morgan and Melissa Barnett
Hana Financial argued priority of rights based on their having used the Hana Financial trademark in the United States since 1995. [read post]