Search for: "United States v. Blank"
Results 301 - 320
of 700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2017, 11:14 pm
The United States Patents Quarterly has been a resource used by intellectual property lawyers for a very long time. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:50 pm
This is Nunes' latest libel lawsuit, just filed yesterday in Florida state court; I'm too slammed to write about it in detail, but I thought I'd pass along the Complaint (Nunes v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
In a controversial decision, Marx v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:22 am
’” United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
The revised EO applies only to noncitizen visa applicants with no previous ties to the United States—a group with scant, if any, statutory or constitutional rights. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:16 am
After the Civil War, the Court invalidated a wartime seizure of property in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo In a 10-3 decision today, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has upheld a trial court injunction against President Trump’s revised travel ban executive order, temporarily barring citizens of six Muslim-majority nations from entering the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:06 am
STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
Writing on a somewhat blank slate, the court wrote: “[B]ecause the market for [stealth products] consists of a single purchaser — the United States Army — there is not a dangerous probability that [defendant] will be able to charge a supracompetitive price. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-10876.pdf Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
" United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Earle, 38 U.S. 519 (1839) and Paul v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 6:22 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
Since the United States is a democratic country, one might say that the nation remains secure as long as threats to the People’s sovereignty over the United States remain at bay. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in State of New York, et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
Bank v. [read post]
