Search for: "United States v. Contents of Account"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
(Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
” It’s the law of the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The Court, explicitly recognizing the relationship between suggestiveness and mistakes in identification has repeatedly expressed concern that police arranged identification procedures may alter a witness’s memory rendering the subsequent identification testimony unreliable (United States v Wade, 388 US 218 [1967], Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293 [1967]; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377 [1968]; Manson v Braithwaite,… [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 5:16 pm
ICANN stays a private company, still working out of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
International Harvester, Inc., 718 F.2d 88, 96 (3d Cir.1983); United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
The court concludes: Whether it is wise for members of the United States Congress to block critical constituents from their social-media accounts is not for a court to say. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm
Three weeks ago, Stanley Fish's essay "The First Amendment and Kittens" reflected on the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The first, the Sixth Circuit’s “authority or duty” test, required plaintiffs to prove “state action” by establishing that either (1) the “text of state law requires an officeholder to maintain a social-media account,” (2) the defendant official “use[s] … state resources” or “government staff” to run the account, or (3) the “accoun[t] belong[s] to an office, rather than an… [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:29 am
For more, read the case of Melvin Colon here, United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:34 pm
H.R.5412: To provide the right of American Indians born in Canada or the United States to pass the borders of the United States to any individual who is a member, or is eligible to be a member, of a Federally recognized Indian tribe in the United States or Canada, and for other purposes. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:28 am
State, supra (quoting Barrett v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
’ United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:23 pm
Justice Kagan also noted the similarity between this case and United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The unanimity of the justices was matched, to an unusual degree, by unanimity among the States and Central government (appearing as interveners in the hearing), whose Solicitors-General ‘grasped the nettle and decided to present a united front’ in seeking a new approach.[2]The decision itself drew upon both existing disenchantment with orthodoxy (or the lack of any accepted interpretation) and upon scholarly critiques, particularly those of Michael Coper (who appeared… [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:19 am
On the eve of oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
