Search for: "United States v. Council"
Results 301 - 320
of 4,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner &… [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:52 am
(Response due June 13, 2013)May 30 2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 15, 2013.Jun 10 2013Brief amicus curiae of DRI -The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.Jun 13 2013Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al filed.Jun 13 2013Brief amicus curiae of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. filed.Jul 15 2013Brief of respondents Richard Stengel, and Mary Lou Stengel in opposition filed.Jul 30 2013Reply of petitioner Medtronic, Inc. filed.Jul… [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:01 pm
United States (Partition Trust Land; Administrative Procedures Act) United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
Faced with Washington’s repeated vetoes of UN Security Council resolutions calling for (in October) a humanitarian pause and (in December) a ceasefire, South Africa v Israel built on previous efforts to evade (Russian and/or Chinese) vetoes of Security Council action concerning mass atrocities in Myanmar, Syria and Ukraine. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:25 pm
The Court recalled its classic case law according to which Article 308 EC may be used as the legal basis for a measure only where no other provision of the EC Treaty gives the EU institutions the necessary power to adopt it (Case C-84/94 United Kingdom v Council [1996] ECR I-5755, paragraph 48 (working time directive case); Case C-22/96 Parliament v Council [1998] ECR I-3231, paragraph 22; and Case C-436/03 Parliament v Council [2006]… [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:04 pm
State, 317 Ark. 414, 878 S.W.2d 717 (1994) (citing United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:51 pm
United States (Indian Commerce Clause)Whiteagle v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:25 pm
The United States Forest Service (the Service) proposed the Smith Creek Project (the Project) in the Gallatin National Forest to reduce the risk of severe wildfire, to reduce the risk of insect infestation and disease, and to promote habitat diversity. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court held that the courts of the United Kingdom do have jurisdiction to judicially review an Order in Council which is made on the advice of the Government of the United Kingdom acting in whole or in part in the interests of the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:50 am
EEOC and Burwell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
This morning I attended oral argument at the United States Supreme Court in the maritime case of Dutra Group v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:27 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:37 am
United States, __ A.3 __ (D.C. 2013), was convicted of multiple felony offenses, including robbery, the only question on appeal was his conviction for felony assault with significant bodily injury (D.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Oklahoma; Post-Conviction Relief; Section 14 of the Curtis Act) United States v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 2:09 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm
Tule River Tribal Council (Tribal Sovereign Immunity)Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
United States, the court analogizes this case to Legal Assistance for Vietnamese Asylum Seekers v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:30 am
Belko (Missouri Humanities Council). [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:06 am
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) apply on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:06 am
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) apply on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
