Search for: "United States v. Dakota" Results 301 - 320 of 1,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
United States, ___ U.S. ___ (June 17, 2019). [read post]
Admissibility of Evidence of Refusal to Submit to a Blood Test The court noted that the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:08 am by Steven Boutwell
A loophole in the drafting of last year’s legislation made its application (including the Commission’s service as the central collector for sales/use taxes on remote sales) contingent on the Supreme Court of the United States ruling the South Dakota sales tax law in Wayfair was constitutional. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:16 am by Ernesto Falcon
North Dakota now has a staggering 60 percent of its homes connected to fiber networks, despite being a very rural state. [read post]
The Food Marketing Institute Case The Argus Leader, a South Dakota newspaper, submitted a FOIA request to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) seeking the name, unique identifier, address, store type and the yearly Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (“SNAP”) sales figures for every store in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am by Kevin Goldberg
I was one of many who traveled (in my case, on foot) to the United States Supreme Court on April 22, 2019 to watch oral arguments in the case of Food Marketing Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
One child, age 20 months, attended the fair on September 16 …Read More » 2015 Outbreak of E. coli O157 cluster, Red River Valley Fair-North Dakota Organism: E. coli O157:H7 Vehicle: Animal contact In July 2015 the North Dakota Department of Health investigated an outbreak of E. coli O157 in persons who attended the Red River Valley Fair held in West Fargo, North Dakota. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:48 pm by Mark Fenster
” The grocers could show that they kept the data from the public and their competitors, and that USDA assured them it would keep the information private (as the United States stated in its amicus brief and during oral argument). [read post]