Search for: "United States v. Daniels" Results 301 - 320 of 2,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2022, 2:07 am by jonathanturley
While largely lost in election day coverage, United States District Judge James Boasberg dismissed the much heralded case of retired Army Lt. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
To that end, this Essay analyzes an undisturbed line of Supreme Court cases from 1980-1990 – United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am by Michael Neuner
However, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently dismissed a Jones Act seaman’s claims for negligence and unseaworthiness, confirming that the seaman’s burden is not weightless. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am by Michael Neuner
However, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently dismissed a Jones Act seaman’s claims for negligence and unseaworthiness, confirming that the seaman’s burden is not weightless. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 6:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Velozny v Velozny, 2021 WL 5567265 (2d Cir.,2021) the Second Circuit affirmed a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Daniels, J.), granting Petitioner-Appellee Nir Velozny’s motion for summary judgment and petition to return the children R.V., N.V., and E.V. to Israel .On appeal Ms. [read post]
22 May 2019, 11:52 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (Affinity Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, invalidating the federal corruption convictions of former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Colin O'Keefe
King, where the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that will have major implications on searches and seizures. [read post]