Search for: "United States v. Diaz-Diaz"
Results 301 - 320
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2009, 1:56 pm
E.g., State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:47 pm
United States, 128 S.Ct. 1994 (2008) and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:07 am
Case date: 26 January 2021 Case number: No. 19-2390 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 9:27 am
The United States Supreme Court addressed this question in Crawford v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:46 pm
This case is a response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:14 pm
At the time of this appeal, the United States Supreme Court had granted certiorari but not yet decided United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:23 am
Code defines "official proceeding" as "a proceeding before a judge or court of the United States", i.e., a federal civil or criminal case. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:07 pm
Virginia, in which the Court will hear oral argument on January 11, 2010, may overturn or clarify the Court's decision last Term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:53 am
UniversalHUB reports that the petitioner in last Term’s Confrontation Clause case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:03 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:18 pm
The issue in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:10 pm
Tuesday’s oral argument is in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
United States In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
Nunez-Diaz 19-645Issues: (1) Whether the respondent, Hector Sebastion Nunez-Diaz, is categorically barred from establishing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:00 pm
In Melendez-Diaz, for example, the United States Supreme Court held that certificate of drug analyses, prepared by chemists when testing whether a particular item is a controlled substance, are testimonial in nature and, in order to be admissible, the drug lab experts should be called to testify. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
United States, holding that evidence obtained through a search that was legal when it was conducted will not be subject to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
