Search for: "United States v. Duncan"
Results 301 - 320
of 370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2010, 8:53 am
by Duncan Hollis Yesterday, the Japanese Government (now led by the Democratic Party after nearly five-plus decades of rule by the Liberal Democratic Party) confirmed that in the 1960s Japan and the United States entered into a series of secret defense pacts. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 11:34 am
He referred to the United States' jury-trial right, one that the Court, reversing precedent, held to be fundamental in Duncan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:25 am
And this brings me to another strength of the book: Greg significantly expands our knowledge of the legal history of this era by his careful account of the litigation of Duncan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
(Abbott) v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) McKeiver v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 7:06 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:05 pm
United States, 60 Fed. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
" People tend to forget that Bayer AG first invented aspirin in 1897 but lost its rights to the brand name in the United States by allowing it to escape into the public domain, i.e., go generic or commit "genericide," a tragic commercial fate shared famously by Duncan Yo-Yo Co. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
The basic right to a jury in a criminal case had been extended to the states 11 years earlier, in the 1968 decision in Duncan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:03 am
This is another punitive damages case, coming shortly after Duncan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Danielle Parr, Entertainment Software Association of Canada Anti-circumvention provisions, Canadian piracy of video games is disproportionate to the United States, TPMs used for more than preventing piracy. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:10 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:04 pm
In a lengthy opinion in Duncan v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(Spicy IP) Defining ‘literary works’ for copyright protection (International Law Office) Drafting and interpretation of patent claims (IP Frontline) Israel Israel Patent Office accepts lacks jurisdiction and rules anyway: Karl Storz GmbH & Co v Bausch and Lomb (The IP Factor) Economist report ranks Israel 10th in terms of innovation (The IP Factor) Mauritius Mauritius launches IP sensitivity drive (Afro-IP) Netherlands Presiding… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:56 pm
In this week's call, regular panelists Jeremy Phillips and Duncan Bucknell are joined by Peter Ollier, Don Zuhn and Ben Lehman to discuss: The Tom Tom and Microsoft case; Open source, Linux and the press; Recent patent reform proposals in Australia and comparisons with Europe and the United States; Tafas v Doll, Continuations and Rule 78; and Apportionment of damages in the current US patent reform bill. [read post]
