Search for: "United States v. Flood"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2011, 7:50 pm
Attacking the validity of a patent is attacking something granted by the United States Government, while deciding infringement is just considering one private company's arguments against another. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
In a blog post for the Washington Post, Ezra Klein discusses Douglas v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
In South Africa v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am
And then there is the open the flood gate argument: “What would happen if every state in the union did this? [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 9:06 pm
The trial date in the United States of America v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
We’ve been covering the United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
The Branch Consultants v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
The rule also includes “Waters and Features That are Not Waters of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
The rule also includes “Waters and Features That are Not Waters of the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:05 pm
Blum v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
First, what does the treaty obligate the United States to do? [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
Caminetti v United States, 242 U.S. 470 (1917) held that the Mann Act's prohibition on the transportation of women or girls across state lines "for the purpose of prostitution, or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose" included the purpose of non-commercial but extra-marital sex. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:18 am
The district court however relied on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case, United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:39 am
Union with the United States would make some sense. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Ceballos—a 2006 United States Supreme Court decision—does not apply in the setting of public employees who are teachers and scholars. [read post]
