Search for: "United States v. Martinez"
Results 301 - 320
of 877
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:15 am
The potential employee had earned a Bachelor of Science degree, as well as a certificate in Business Management and Marketing from a United States university. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:18 pm
* * * The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Unit School Dist. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
” United Fire & Cas. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
Martinez, 230 Cal. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:42 pm
* * * The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:42 pm
* * * The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Hurles 14-191Issue: (1) Whether, under this Court's decision in Martinez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Hurles 14-191Issue: (1) Whether, under this Court's decision in Martinez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm
Referring to last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:26 am
United States, and of Justice Antonin Scalia’s outburst at its high point. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:53 am
United States, testing the sweep — or the narrowness — of a federal law that seeks to protect evidence of crime from being destroyed. [read post]
