Search for: "United States v. Matthew Day"
Results 301 - 320
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
” Matthews v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:00 am
[California v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming, noting that at “issue is not just Lee’s fate, but also the Court’s view of the state of plea bargaining in this country. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Could the United States find a way forward one year after the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack? [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
In Colgrove v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires high-level officers of the United States to be appointed through nomination by the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Matthews J held that the plaintiff had a residual reputation which was damaged by the newspaper’s allegations. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
The Snyders are supported by a number of Veteran's organizations, by 48 states and the District of Columbia, and by a bipartisan group of nearly half the United States Senate. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court on Aug. 24 declined to stay an injunction by Judge Matthew J. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm
Army Major Matthew Seeger, another defense counsel for bin Attash, voices an objection to any form of broad protective order. [read post]
7 May 2015, 1:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:10 am
In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks back at last week’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:18 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Marion County or Shelby County v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
RUSK STATE HOSPITAL v. [read post]
