Search for: "United States v. Mauro" Results 301 - 320 of 441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the court will consider whether administrative law judges of the SEC are officers of the United States within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which a commercial fisherman was prosecuted under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized fish, and the amicus brief that Cato filed in the case. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
 In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
United States and to recognize “Congress’s clear intent that victims of spurious forfeiture cases not emerge from the process injured. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment, concluding that “what seems on its face like a clear rule may prove challenging for courts to apply in practice. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Amy Howe
United States and the possibility that “overcriminalization actually increases the commission of criminal acts, particularly by white-collar offenders. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
United States, involving how to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, for this blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am by Marissa Miller
Perry, United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:59 am by Susan Brenner
A few months later, Mauro’s case was assigned to Washington State Police Detective Wilcox, who reviewed the case with Gardner. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]