Search for: "United States v. Mayer"
Results 301 - 320
of 348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2009, 5:14 pm
It must have been a showstopper, because after hearing defense counsel's opening statement and before hearing any evidence, a juror in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 1:45 pm
He quoted Jones v Mayer, a case upholding the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (codified at § 1981), but he replaced the phrase "black man" with "[any person]" and focused solely on the contracts aspect of the Act. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:47 am
Yesterday we filed this cert. amicus brief on behalf of the National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys and the National District Attorneys Association in No. 08-1065, Pottawattamie County, Iowa v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:57 am
John v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:48 am
United States, 543 F.3d 1276 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
Among the books which extensively detail the matters written of here are Jane Mayer's The Dark Side, Philippe Sands' The Torture Team, Jack Goldsmith's The Terror Presidency (Goldsmith is a former head of the Office of Legal Counsel), and Steven Wax's Kafka Comes To America. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
SCOTUS docket here Noted here: Ross Runkel; Workplace Horizons; Mayer BrownSelected Pending Petitions for Certiorari: Ricci v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
In denying JJB's motion and granting plaintiffs' cross motion, Suffolk County Supreme Court Justice Peter Mayer held: An insurance agent or broker has a common law duty to obtain requested coverage for a client within a reasonable amount of time or inform the client of the inability to do so (see Murphy v Kuhn, 90 NY2d 266; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Most notably, in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:39 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Brokerage - Commercial / Office 2 Cheryl Mackey self-empliyed Homebuyer 3 Peter Pellegrini NOI Commercial Real Estate Broker 3 Mary Papastratis Remax Today Brokerage - Residential 2 Robert Balducci Bronx Community Consultants Accounting for Real Estate Owners 2 mayer kohn Henry management Real estate management 3 Brian Scully PropertyShark.com Marketing 1 Prynn Kaplan PAL Realty General Contractor/Developer 1 Maria Goris CitySites Brokerage -… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 2:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch) Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then… [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:47 pm
Co., 46 AD3d 174, 844 NYS2d 374 [2d Dept 2007]; Dutkanych v United States Fid. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:08 am
Supreme Court held in Jones v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
United States, involving two provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
