Search for: "United States v. McConnell"
Results 301 - 320
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 12:22 am
The opinion, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:07 am
If you are the plaintiff in Gubala v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:33 am
The district court agreed, concluding that based on relevant precedents from the United States Supreme Court (in Clapper v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am
” Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
Congratulations to the longest serving Senate Leader in history, Mitch McConnell. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
The first instance of the Court’s misfiring came in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
Gore, Citizens United, and NFIB -- and perhaps Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am
United States that Congress cannot criminalize Communist Party membership. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am
If enacted, it would “direct[] the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military” within 30 days “unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force[,]” though it excludes efforts to “defend [the United States] from imminent attack. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
United States will unleash even worse lawlessness than we have already witnessed. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Constitution requires to be eligible to serve as the President of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
The trial court did not err by revoking the defendant’s probation where there was substantial evidence that he had constructive possession of controlled substances State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
