Search for: "United States v. Nixon" Results 301 - 320 of 840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 5:56 am by alysondrake
She beat a 14-year incumbent for her spot in the United States House of Representatives, earning the nickname “Battling Bella. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 8:33 am by Kathy Darvil
  To see the complete list of resources on U.S. presidential elections, search the SARA catalog for the Library of Congress subjects, Presidents—United States—Elections. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The court cited the case of Nixon v US, which involved impeachment but not of president Nixon. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Just answerin’—and in only two words: Presidential Immunity (see Nixon v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:51 pm
Malek, to the board of visitors of the United States Military Academy. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Kathleen Claussen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—ultimately ruled in his favor in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
State, 469 N.E.2d 1153, 1157 (Indiana Supreme Court 1984) (referencing Nixon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Steve Vladeck
As he noted, “The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in [United States v.] [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:38 am by Matt Tait
It didn’t take long after Trump’s unexpected election as the 45th president of the United States for the encryption debate to reemerge. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm by John Bellinger
  Or would they have insisted that they all be moved to the United States? [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 1:38 pm
Kozinksi was channeling Justice Brandeis’s words dissenting in United States v. [read post]