Search for: "United States v. Obey"
Results 301 - 320
of 611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm
Assn. of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm
Assn. of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:25 am
These terms were important to Cosino’s status in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:03 am
Powledge Unit in Palestine, Texas. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the… [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 5:52 am
Harwell v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
See State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
See State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
United States (1944) and Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:52 am
(Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese of the United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
United States, 417 US 85 – Supreme Court 1974 Even a third-party to the third-party preventing compliance with a subpoena can result in a contempt finding. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
§ 1514A.The plaintiffs, joined by the intervening plaintiff United States Secretary of Labor, sought an injunction enforcing a preliminary order of the Secretary which required CTI to reinstate the plaintiffs to their previous positions. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:05 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
