Search for: "United States v. Poland"
Results 301 - 320
of 479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
(IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Campaign against America Invents Act intensifies (Inventive Step) Will you be crushed like a bug? [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
(IPKat) United States US General The USTR Special 301 Report released: some initial reactions (TechnoLlama) (Knowledge Ecology International) (Public Knowledge) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Docs) Protective orders put at risk by new bill – Sunshine in Litigation Act (Patent Docs) US Patents Making the patenting process faster (Patenthink) USPTO official ‘optimistic’ that Green Patent Fast Track will be extended again (Green Patent Blog) US Patents… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
[United Kingdom] [Habitual Residence] Lakeman v Weed, 2011 WL 824588 (D.Minn.) [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Frans Nooren and Stopaq (EPLAW) New Zealand New Zealand, new zeal from Ministry in seeking feedback (Class 99) Poland Secondary meaning and distinctiveness – the saga continues – TECHNOPOL (Class 46) Romania Plum GI protection for Romanian marmalade (Class 46) Slovenia Supreme Court of Republic of Slovenia: difference in wording of patent description to that of prior art not sufficient for finding of novelty (Kluwer Patent Blog) United Kingdom Fake Jake? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
Denomination of origin granted for Machu Picchu Coffee – Huadquina (IP tango) Poland Courts note differences between wine and vodka (Class 46) Russia More fashion apparel companies seeking to register trademark in Russia (Russian Patents Blog) Switzerland The new Swiss patent litigation system (EPLAW) United Kingdom PCC Page 23: IPOff’s tentacles get some cross-examination? [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
See, for example:Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World by Clinton V. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
(PatLit) United States US Patent Reform US Patent Reform: America Invents Act passes Senate with broad support and status update (Maryland IP Law Blog) (IPblog) (Patent Law Practice Center) Post-disclosure grace period – unique but good policy (Patently-O) What are the provisions of the proposed ‘First-inventor-to-file’ System in S. 23? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
[X] (EPLAW) Peru INDECOPI names a Regulatory Council for Pisco (IP tango) Poland PIONEER v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Rockwool Limited (Class 46) (IPKat) Copyright confusion (1709 Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation moves to senate floor (Patent Docs) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inventive Step) How will the new House members handle patent reform? [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Kalymon, 89, immigrated to the United States from Germany in 1949 and became a U.S. citizen in 1955. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
(PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches websites to discuss patent and trademark procedures (inovia) US Patent Reform Will patent reform come up in a big way in the 112th Congress? [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
United Black Fund v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas: ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:54 am
Anyway, a new podcast is available from the CCC's Beyond the Book site: it features a (United States) Suffolk University Law School event in which CCC’s Chris Kenneally speaks with entertainment industry attorney Patti Jones and advertising executive Lenora Cushing; the trio ponder on the way trends in music licensing are changing how rock bands achieve fame and fortune. [read post]
