Search for: "United States v. Shields"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
In essence, since these are the king’s men, they are his sovereign representatives, shielded under the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any S [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
In Doe v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 3:18 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:37 am
They had entered the United States illegally in the 1990s. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:26 am
-EU Privacy Shield (RIP) and put an asterisk next to the Standard Contractual Clauses (“Old SCCs”), particularly in respect of transfers to the United States. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm
Megan Russo, Executive Editor October 20, 2021 | Regulating Prison Labor | Experts are debating whether current workplace protections adequately shield incarcerated workers. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:41 am
All federal judges take an oath to administer justice under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:26 pm
Mehta of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia resolved the DOJ's motion in two steps. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:03 pm
In Shields v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:03 pm
In Shields v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:48 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said in its 2009 United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 12:48 pm
Hispanic Chambers of Commerce et. al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States decided a malicious prosecution case earlier this month. [read post]
