Search for: "United States v. Steven Stands" Results 301 - 320 of 836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2017, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
The proposed constitutional amendment is one sentence: “The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1094 n.14 (8th Cir. 1973) (likewise); Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies 1043-45 (4th ed. 2011); Laurence Tribe, Constitutional Law, § 12-17, at 926; Toni M. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
  The AmeriKat was unable to attend, but the ever succinct, Steven Baldwin (A&O) went along to report for those who missed it. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Sarah Harrington argued for the United States as amicus curiae in support of Chester. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am by Randy Barnett
For example, the words “equal protection” does not appear as a free standing “equality principle,” but appears in the phrase “equal protection of the law” and this passage is embedded in a larger clause that also refers to the “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” (which no state statute may abridge) and the “due process of the laws” (which no state shall deny when… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:23 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
Chester and the United States diverge over whether an intervenor always must establish standing. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s decision this week in Moore v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:01 pm by Coral Beach
This year the Town Hall panel is scheduled to include: Al V. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Scalia expressed his view forcefully in a dissent in the 2001 case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
  Id.at 201,108 S.Ct. at 2347 (citing United States v. [read post]