Search for: "United States v. Union Corp." Results 301 - 320 of 888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co., 42 NY2d 884, 885, quoting 30 NY Jur, Insurance, § 1099, p 484 [emphasis added]; see Agoado Realty Corp. v United Intl. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:42 am by Joel E. Tasca
In addition, several amicus briefs in support of granting certiorari have been filed in Spokeo, which can be found here (by Pacific Legal Foundation), here (by ACA International), here (by Trans Union LLC), here (by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America), here (by eBay Inc., Facebook, Inc., Google, Inc. and Yahoo! [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am by Andrew Frisch
United States Steel Corp., 632 F.Supp.2d 398, 412-13 (W.D.Pa.2009) (“Section 203(o) relates to the compensability of time spent donning, doffing, and washing in the collective-bargaining process. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
(d/b/a Her Majesty’s Credit Union)Case number: 12-cv-02939 (United States District Court for the District of Colorado)Case filed: November 8, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 9, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 2014-123 SEC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The case involving a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act is Sprint/United Management v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Reference Staff
Village of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91 (1979), and Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH. a reference from the Landgericht Düsseldorf on a matter of great concern to the standard-essential patent (SEP) community. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]