Search for: "United States v. Wolfe" Results 301 - 320 of 930
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2018, 12:45 pm by Solomon L. Wisenberg
Wolfe worked for 30 years for the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence ("SSCI") handling top secret and other classified information provided by the Executive Branch... [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Collins v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm by Wolfgang Demino
George, for Plaintiff-Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.Before: SMITH, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.STEPHEN A. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:02 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Wolf described as “the stirring up of the client to litigate in an endeavour to enforce rights which she would not otherwise pursue,” without proper counsel of dispute resolution alternatives and the long-term implications to the broader family unit of pursuing high-conflict litigation strategies. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause, arguing that “the case illustrates the dangers of a powerful and unaccountable government in which agencies are allowed to serve as judge, jury and executioner, so to speak, in civil enforcement actions. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost remarks that given the justices’ ostensible concern “about the risk of diplomatic friction between the United States and other countries when they decided to bar suits in U.S. courts against foreign corporations for violations of international law” last week in Jesner v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:19 pm by Georgialee Lang
Big sting is illegal in the United States it has been a significant tool for Canadian law enforcement and has resulted in convictions that might never otherwise have been obtained. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Hughes v. [read post]