Search for: "V. Santos" Results 301 - 320 of 867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
O relatório da juíza Márcia Santos Capanema de Souza, da 7 ª Vara Cível do Rio, afirma que o procurador “argumentou que tais vídeos colocam sob suspeita a sua conduta moral e ética, impondo sérias conseqüências”. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm by Larry
So, this is the first in what should be a small group of catching-up posts.United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:01 am
Under these standards, the court said that it could not say that the supervisor’s testimony did not support the findings of guilt and declined to disturb the Board’s determinations.As to the penalties imposed, the court said that much deference is to be afforded to an agency’s determination regarding a sanction, especially in situations where, as here, matters of internal discipline in a law enforcement organization are concerned, quoting from Santos v Chesworth,… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
Randolph Santos Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYFamily Law Documentary Evidence Shows No Disputed Facts To Set Aside Stipulation; Husband Granted Dismissal Cherfas v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:07 pm by John C. Manoog III
Gainsboro Restaurant, INC, Feb. 26, 2014, Cape Cod Injury Lawyer Blog Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Rules Property Owner May Be Liable for Certain Open and Obvious Hazards — Dos Santos v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff failed to put forth any evidence that would support a finding of disability or insanity sufficient to show that plaintiff was unable to function in society (see Santo B. v Roman Catholic Archdiocese of N.Y., 51 AD3d 956, 958 [2d Dept 2008]). [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:38 am
Santos -- Scalia finds that the money laundering statute is ambiguous and rules for criminal defendant that it means proceeds, not profits.I'll end with Sorich v. [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 3:58 pm
Dice (art. 19) que motivar "supone expresar, de manera ordenada y clara, razones jurídicamente válidas, aptas para justificar la decisión". [read post]