Search for: "VIRGIN v. STATE"
Results 301 - 320
of 700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2014, 5:25 pm
It also explicitly recognized that groundwater was a component of the Virgin Water Supply. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:44 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
There were no Virgin Mobile products featured, it did not discuss the Virgin Mobile brand, and really, the casting of live action Disney princesses had nothing at all to do with Virgin Mobile’s business. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am
The CopyKat suspects she will, but to an extent it's virgin territory in the United Kingdom. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:59 am
”; stating “End the problems now with high quality, MADE IN U.S.A. 100% virgin ptfe pipe thread sealing tapes! [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
The recent UK Supreme Court case Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 (see IPKat here) concerned whether a finding of validity of a patent as between two parties was res judicata even if the patent was subsequently revoked. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Martin Heinrich (D-NM), who touched on commercial and military space activities, particularly those in his state. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
The employee’s other claims failed on various grounds (Haight v NYU Langone Medical Center, Inc, June 27, 2014, Schofield, L). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Rothrock v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:36 pm
Virgin Islands. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:37 am
Virgin Islands and across the United States. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
” (para 77)“I accept that what Mr Turner was describing was obvious,…” (para 85)To state what in itself should now be obvious, Virgin won, and Rovi’s patent was held invalid for lack of inventive step over the first piece of prior art. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:11 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:11 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:11 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
Data Breach Notification A summary of H.B. 232’s data breach notification provisions, which generally mirror the statutes enacted in the other 46 states, as well as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, is provided below. [read post]
