Search for: "Vote v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 9,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
When Tatel pressed further, Gershengorn seemed to agree that this would doom the United States’s position. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am by NCC Staff
 “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,” read the amendment’s first section. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
Yet they can only do so in regard to certain types of votes. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
The United States is a little less monolithic, but tends to favor preemption in many if not most cases. read more [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  About a century ago, reformers throughout the nation were in the thick of a contentious national movement to bring about popular election not of presidents, but of United States senators. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:54 am by Jacob Dougherty
Moreover, the court considered the US Constitution’s Twenty-Fourth Amendment, which states that a citizen’s right to vote in a federal election “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
 In 2009, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:09 am
Gabriel Jackson Chin, University of California, Davis, School of Law, has published The Blueprint for Dred Scott: United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:09 am by Christine Corcos
Gabriel Jackson Chin, University of California, Davis, School of Law, has published The Blueprint for Dred Scott: United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:27 am by Joe Palazzolo
Tomorrow will mark the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]