Search for: "WEST v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
On February 28 the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am
In this episode, you’ll learn about: The prior art, or evidence, of earlier technology that EFF was able to present to courts to prove that the so-called “podcasting patent” was invalid How the landmark Alice v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, for example, recently ruled in the Epic v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 2:25 pm
The test was established by the California Supreme Court case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm
As a reminder, an “exception” for the purposes of AB 5 does not mean that the worker is automatically classified as an independent contractor; rather, it means that the classification will be pursuant to the rules in existence before AB 5 and Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
The design of the class action covered consumers in Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, New Mexico, Maine, Minnesota, Michigan, South Dakota, Utah, California, Iowa, North Dakota, and West Virginia. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:13 pm
Marko v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
California Beginning January 1, 2022, California’s cannabis cultivation taxes increased to reflect an adjustment for inflation as required under the Cannabis Tax Law. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm
But, due to the influence - up till now - of Roe v. [read post]
CMS Vaccine Mandate Takes Effect in 26 States as Fifth Circuit Alters Scope of Nationwide Injunction
16 Dec 2021, 2:28 pm
Fifth Circuit Decision Although the 5th Circuit enjoined the OSHA vaccine mandate, which applied to all businesses with more than 100 employees, in BST Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:17 pm
See Louisiana v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am
Over the past several years, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the federal law that provides social media platforms with immunity from liability for user content and was once hailed as “the law that gave us the modern Internet,” has gone from relative obscurity (at least outside of tech circles) to being a household name and politicians’ favorite punching bag. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:37 am
McGirt v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 11:20 am
Luis V. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
This week, we filed our reply brief in Mohamud v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:49 pm
However, a binary outcome is now most likely as the federal appeals court for the West Coast cites California's Chavez case law, according to which the failure of a theory under federal antitrust law (Sherman Act) spells doom for a California UCL claim on the same basis. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
California Trucking Association Inc. v. [read post]
