Search for: "Wages v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 8,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
In ADI Worldlink, L.L.C. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:34 pm
Murphy Oil USA and Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
In a lawsuit brought by Viet Bui and Christina Avalos-Reyes on behalf of themselves and similarly situated employees known as Viet Bui et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
In Ji v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 9:27 am
Buchspies v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:20 pm
Earnshaw v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:57 am
The new law states that employees who prevail in court "shall be awarded triple damages, as liquidated damages, for any loss of wages and other benefits. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:00 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
On Thursday, April 14, 2022, in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:30 pm
Herrera, et al. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:18 pm
Eskaton et al., alleged multiple violations of state wage and hour laws. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:09 am
The 2012 amendments were set to expire on November 6, 2015, at which time the law would have reverted to its pre-2012 state, However on October 26, 2015, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a bill (A07594) extending the expiration period of the amendments to November 6, 2018, thereby continuing to permit the broader types of deductions from wages under section 193 of the NYLL. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:00 am
Marrero v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:50 pm
Marlow v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:16 pm
” The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which hears appeals from the Federal trial courts in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and the United States Virgin Islands, recently examined the professional employee exemption in the case of Stephanie Higgins v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
The Ninth Circuit relied on and analogized the decision in Schachter v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
Sharp v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 10:34 am
Mallano v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
UPS argued that 218.5 applied because the remedy under section 226.7 constitutes a wage under Murphy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:02 pm
Additional Resources: Ward v. [read post]
