Search for: "Wait v. Second Judicial District Court" Results 301 - 320 of 609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am by MBettman
Instead, the Second District found the application of the no-proximate-cause-rule to be dispositive. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am by Dennis Crouch
  I’ll note here that courts appear to generally be waiting for the appeal decision before announcing preclusion, although it is unclear whether that approach is somehow required or simply prudential (since district courts generally see the Federal Circuit as unpredictable). [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The section provides in its entirety as follows: On application by or for a member, the supreme court in the judicial  district  in  which the office of the limited liability company is located may decree dissolution of a limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Jon Levitan
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy late last month. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
District Court in Michigan, and the federal District judge rejected that sweeping challenge. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit drew comment. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am by Florian Mueller
Others are more focused on strategically striking down certain claims.Some "stallers" may like parallel proceedings where they challenge some claims before PTAB and others in district court. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
  In case you've been in a cave for the past 48 hours, the Honorable Susan Bolton, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, granted a preliminary injunction preventing parts of Arizona's anti-immigrant law. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am by Peter Margulies
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the case of Oberdorf v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
NetChoice and CCIA filed lawsuits against portions of both laws, and federal district courts in both Florida and Texas granted injunctions. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm by Zachary Spilman
In Olano, the Supreme Court made it clear that “the [plain] error must have been prejudicial: It must have affected the outcome of the district court proceedings. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, it has been said, and by the Supreme Court itself.In the 2015 case of Armstrong v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Instead, this Court is required to exercise its independent power of judicial review. [read post]