Search for: "Walk v. Ohio Supreme Court"
Results 301 - 320
of 404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
I wasn't going to write about the Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:42 am
And now it's gone.The 6-2 decision of the Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:07 am
Ohio, for example, the Supreme Court laid down the rule that evidence obtained by the police through a n unreasonable search and seizure may not be used in a state criminal prosecution. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:45 am
The last portion of the Supreme Court’s opinion on this in State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:56 am
* The Supreme Court's tech docket. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Parker filed a motion to dismiss the charges based on some Ohio cases and on Heller, which had just come out of the DC Circuit and was working its way up to the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:44 am
The Ohio Supreme Court handed down some momentous decisions in the last few weeks of 2010, perhaps none more so than State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
Servs. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:50 am
Ohio 2009). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
Judge Phipps continued: I find persuasive the opinion of the Ohio Supreme Court in Ohio v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:32 pm
These courts feel that field sobriety tests, including the Walk-and-Turn and the One-Leg-Stand of the Standardized Field Sobriety Test battery, are simple physical dexterity exercises that can be interpreted by a cop and by others in a California court. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
In a GPS case, where all the right things were argued, Ohio’s 12th District Court of Appeals rejects NY’s Weaver (2009) and Washington’s Jackson (2003) because the Ohio Supreme Court says that the state constitution is to be interpreted like the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm
Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled that if the police has a reasonable suspicion that a crime is afoot or a reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed and dangerous, the police can conduct a reasonable search. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:11 am
The Supreme Court, in Kyllo v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
In fact, a large reason for the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
” But this case, the court decides, is not even a close call on that score: Johnson didn’t change course or otherwise react suspiciously to the police, but simply kept walking in the same direction at the same pace, conduct which “was the quintessential example of ‘going about one’s business’ — protected, unsuspicious conduct that the Supreme Court has characterized as ‘the opposite’ of flight. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:59 am
As the Court stated in Terry v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
(Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Statements made in prior litigation do not trigger recapture rule: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
The Ohio Supreme Court took a look at this back in 2004 in State v. [read post]
