Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 10:15 am
” This provision appears to follow from the Administrative Conference of the United States’ Recommendation 2021-1document, which was entitled “Managing Mass, Computer-Generated, and Falsely Attributed Comments. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am
In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito writes that the Clean Water Act “extends to only those wetlands with a continuous surface connection to bodies that are ‘waters of the United States’ in their own right,’ so that they are ‘indistinguishable’ from those waters. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm
CDC, “Outbreaks of Gastroenteritis Associated with Noroviruses on Cruise Ships – United States, 2002,” MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, Vol. 51, No. 49, pp. 1112-15 (Dec. 13, 2002). [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:00 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715, 754 (2006). [read post]
29 May 2023, 5:00 am
Capital Mortgage Solutions, LLC v The Cincinnati Insurance Company United States District Court Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division, case number 21-cv-10873 [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:05 pm
Brief Overview of “Waters of the United States” The Supreme Court previously considered the scope of “waters of the United States” under the CWA in 2006 in Rapanos. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:22 am
Supreme Court significantly narrowed the definition of “waters of the United States. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:40 pm
United States did leave open the possibility that certain issues concerning impeachment may be justiciable. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:03 pm
The Sacketts sued, alleging that their property was not “waters of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:07 am
United States, finding that Sackett’s wetlands were subject to EPA regulations because they had a “significant nexus [with] navigable waters. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
” The CWA defines navigable waters as “waters of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:01 pm
United States Bureau of Reclamation (Rule 19, Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Eagle Bear, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:16 am
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:03 am
United States Department of the Interior, 1:21-cv-11091-IT; and Responsible Offshore Development Alliance v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
Save the El Dorado Ditch v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am
In fact, plaintiffs allege that Montana has warmed more than most of the contiguous United States because northern latitudes heat more quickly. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
Environmental Protection Agency ARGUED: 10/3/2022 In this case, the Court is considering the proper test for determining if wetlands are “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act, and the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate wetlands in general. [read post]
