Search for: "Weeks v. Weeks" Results 301 - 320 of 66,587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:15 am by Kalvis Golde
” A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Eighteen states filed suit this week in a Tennessee federal district court challenging an EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace issued on April 29. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:48 pm by AccelerateEditor
In 2015, I was struck by a semi-truck on the connector and spent five weeks in the hospital. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Thus, in Auerbach v Bennett (47 NY2d 619 [1979]), New York’s highest court held that courts have the power in shareholder derivative litigation to grant unnamed interested shareholders leave to intervene – even for the first time on appeal. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On Tuesday 7 and Wednesday 8 May 2024, there was a final hearing in the case of MBR Acres v Persons Unknown QB-2021-003094. [read post]
12 May 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  It appears that divisions may also be discussing their approaches amongst each other given that they cite each other’s decisions that are issued in the same week or even on the same day. [read post]
  The Iranian asylum seeker, applicant ASF-17, applied to the Federal Court of Australia for a writ of habeas corpus in 2023 on the basis that his continuing detention exceeded the constitutional limitation identified in the orders of NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs released the week prior. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]