Search for: "Wells v. State of California"
Results 301 - 320
of 12,210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 9:57 am
New Directions Program v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:59 am
”[2] Effectively, it permits a person subject to a valid non-compete agreement from another state to seek employment in California and invoke Section 16600.5 to prevent the enforcement of the out-of-state non-compete within California. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm
”[2] Effectively, it permits a person subject to a valid non-compete agreement from another state to seek employment in California and invoke Section 16600.5 to prevent the enforcement of the out-of-state non-compete within California. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
See TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
See TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
California man attends the Hmong New Year Festival at the state fairgrounds in Sacramento, hoping to distribute religious tokens. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
But in Lindke v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:53 pm
Related Cases: Lagleva v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Given Pruneyard -- which, I get, was rendered in an era in which California courts were perhaps more strongly free speech oriented than today -- I think that the state court might well have been more solicitous of the state law constitutional claim than federal judges.Plaintiff can still take its shot in the United States Supreme Court, but I don't think that'll go anywhere. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
Riehl shows how Vincent AI can compare legal jurisdictions by generating memorandums on the same question for California, New York, the UK, and Spain. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:51 am
Garnier and Lindke v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Well, give it enough time and someone will prove you wrong. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
Kiwi Farms has had a well-documented history of sparking campaigns of doxing, often targeting LBGTQ+ people. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
Cite to Holomaxx v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
California precedent currently allows California courts to enforce judgments of other tribunals (e.g., other states) even when those judgments enforce gambling debts. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 10:00 am
The case, Martinez v. [read post]
