Search for: "William D Marshall" Results 301 - 320 of 595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
Marshall – determined the bankruptcy court lacked the constitutional authority to decide the underlying state law issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
  This includes the notorious layabout Marshall v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:28 am by Yolanda Young
Neither the tastemaker, nor the woman who’d worked in the department store, seemed to really want to practice law. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:25 am by Jennifer L. Behrens
Sears Law Library) University of Baltimore Law Library University of British Columbia (UBC) Law Library University of Chicago (D'Angelo Law Library) University of Cincinnati College of Law (Robert S. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 9:26 pm
If you were to take that attitude, you’d be quite incorrect in doing so. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:28 am by law shucks
The final addition to the nameplate was William R. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall promised, “We’ll definitely have more nitrogen hypoxia executions in Alabama. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Minutes earlier, however, Attorney General William Barr had ordered federal law enforcement officials and military police under federal control to push peaceful protesters from the streets around Lafayette Square—which they did using flashbangs, smoke bombs, pepper balls, rubber bullets and mounted police officers. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Williams et al., Public financing of green cathedrals, 5 ALBANY GOVERNMENT LAW REVIEW 123 (2012)Ray Yasser, The case for reviving the four-year deal, 86 TULANE LAW REVIEW 987 (2012) [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am by Andrew Hamm
As he wrote to a clerk who advised that the court not grant the case, “I’d rather see us knock this out. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Peter Margulies
Marshall is simply inapposite to the military justice context. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
When the justices finally changed course, it appeared to be in response to the threat by President Franklin D. [read post]