Search for: "Wood v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 301 - 320
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
The California Court of Appeal debunked that thinking in the case of Ryland Mews v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
The other two pending cases are Samsung v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
United States, a case about whether the VA was required to comply with a provision of U.S. code known as the “Rule of Two” that requires contracting officers to award contracts to veteran-owned small businesses under certain conditions—in the Court’s opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that Congress’ use of the words “shall award contracts” conveyed a “mandatory duty” and that the Rule of Two must… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 4. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
— Citizens United v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:54 am
The two agencies investigate employee complaints for both state and federal charges. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
The brief supports certiorari — but only for one of the two questions presented: namely, whether a supplier can be held liable for providing ‘all or a substantial portion of the components of a patented invention’ from the United States when the supplier ships for combination abroad only a single commodity component of a multi-component invention The patent in the case involves a DNA amplification kit used for personal… [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
The injunction was granted against Helen Wood who now says that she regrets speaking to the press about the case years ago. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Dialogue, 27 U.S. 1 (1829) United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Lee, No. 15-955 (whether IPRs violate Separation of Powers; two amici now filed in support) Post Grant Admin: Click-to-Call Tech, LP v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
And so it was that, as foretold, respondent in four-time relist Woods v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
And 10,000 more are coming…* CJEU on taser, ahm, tacit prorogation of jurisdictionMark pens of Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others (Case C-175/15), a decision where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressed the issue of whether Article 24 of Brussels I Regulation applies in cases where one party is domiciled in a non-EU Member State. * Two Book Reviews: European Law Design and The Changing European… [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Lee, No. 15-955 (whether IPRs violate Separation of Powers; two amici now filed in support) Post Grant Admin: Click-to-Call Tech, LP v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
Woods v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
The Ohio Willow Wood Company, No. 15-567 Allvoice Developments US, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
