Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
This morning Lord Neuberger handed down the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in the Trunki case, PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
There was nothing in the wording of the legislation which showed that the intent of the advertiser had any relevance. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
(i) Meaning of Precarious In the context of art 8 and removal, Lord Wilson traced the first use of the word “precarious” to Mitchell v UK [1998] ECHR 120 where the ECtHR said that precariousness was an “important” but “not decisive” consideration and where family life had been developed with clear knowledge of one spouse’s precarious immigration status then only in the “most exceptional circumstances”… [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:31 am
" In other words, Regen wanted to have its cake and eat it.Finally, Lord Justice Floyd noted that Regen "has shown itself perfectly content to launch litigation in multiple countries against Estar with no apparent regard for saving costs. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Arnold J considered the criteria set down by the Court of Appeal in Novartis v Hospira [2013], but noted that it was of concern that Lord Hoffman’s judgment in the Privy Council case National Commercial Bank Jamaica v Olint [2009] had not been cited. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
Certain Herald TV critics (Glenn was right about V however -- it rocked).Oh the melodrama:Rothstein mused that he had three options -- kill himself, live life "on the lam as a fugitive'' or go to prison and risk being killed there because he had made enemies, said the law firm's co-founder, Stuart Rosenfeldt, according to the website. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:05 am
There was usually no need to direct the jury as to the meaning of ordinary words, and therefore here, in the absence of any query from the jury, the judge did not err in not directing them as to the meaning of “substantial”. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The Applicant submitted a Written Memorial [word] to the Court on 2 February 2012. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:11 am
Lord Justice Thorpe agreed with CMEC's submission that the section 39A procedure fell without the express wording of section 9 of the Limitation Act, namely "an action to recover any sum recoverable by virtue of any enactment". [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
The rub is that the misconduct hearing to which the Supreme Court referred in its additional wording was materially different to what it is now. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:35 am
In relation to the arguments concerning the EIR 2004 Lord Neuberger considered that in the light of the wording of arts 6.1-6.3 of the 2003 Directive it would be impermissible for the executive to have another attempt at preventing disclosure, and therefore EIR 2004, reg 18, is incompatible with art 6 of the Directive. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
In other words, the focus of the analysis is usually the question of proportionality. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Details of the mechanism of the alleged fraud can be found in the Opinions of Lord Tyre, [2015] CSOH 150, and Lord Doherty, [2016] CSOH 107. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
The selection must also have a technical effect, or in other words, be another invention. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Bennett v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am
Secondly, it is clear from the wording and structure of paragraphs 47 to 51 of Lord Hoffmann’s speech that he regarded the dealing requirement as an essential element of the tort. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
In other words the appeal concerns an application for PII, not 54. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
The key to answering this question lies in paragraphs [116] to [119] of Lord Justice Jacob's judgment in Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
The key to answering this question lies in paragraphs [116] to [119] of Lord Justice Jacob's judgment in Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd. [read post]
