Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
They are either the physical or abstract manifestations, signs, animated by the meaning breathed into it the way that "the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit primarily applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:48 am
Trecarrell House Limited v Rouncefield (2020) EWCA Civ 760 It is fair to say this Court of Appeal decision has been widely and keenly awaited. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Grisworld v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
On 3 June 2020 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2020] UKSC 23. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 11:20 am
” The FTT had distinguished Nemcova v Fairfield Rents Ltd (2016) UKUT 303 (LC) (our note here) on the basis that “Lord Millett in Uratemp describes the ordinary meaning of the word “dwelling” and indicates that it has no specialised legal meaning. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm
Johnson and U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:07 pm
[Note that the word "nonsense" is being used here to signify how rude and bad it looks. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
The Ministers are Oliver Dowden MP (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport); Caroline Dinenage MP (Minister for Digital and Culture) and Baroness Williams (Lords Minister, Home Office). [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am
The Ministers are Oliver Dowden MP (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport); Caroline Dinenage MP (Minister for Digital and Culture) and Baroness Williams (Lords Minister, Home Office). [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Secondly, giving the words used their literal meaning does not produce an empty result. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:31 am
" In other words, Regen wanted to have its cake and eat it.Finally, Lord Justice Floyd noted that Regen "has shown itself perfectly content to launch litigation in multiple countries against Estar with no apparent regard for saving costs. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
The reason they will be there for each other and their Lord is the reason they believe He was and is there for us. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am
” Those words are taken from the 1941 case of Liversidge v Anderson, an English case which many are now digging out and dusting off for its resonance with today’s circumstances. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
According to Lord Judge CJ (at [73]): “[M]odern technology has done away with the need for such direct personal communication. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
The wording of the order should be discussed and agreed with the parties (paragraph 23). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:16 pm
and Chocktaw Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:30 am
The Lord Chief Justice - Lord Burnett of Maldon - then issued this statement which emphasised the increased use of telephone and video hearings:"Given the rapidly evolving situation, there is an urgent need to increase the use of telephone and video technology immediately to hold remote hearings where possible. [read post]
