Search for: "Worth v. Price*" Results 301 - 320 of 2,439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2019, 11:02 am by Giles Peaker
Sahota v Prior & Anor (2019) EWHC 1418 (Ch) Just a short note, but worth it, because every angel in heaven sings when a ‘sale and rent back’ set up comes to grief Briefly, Mr & Mrs Prior bought their home 35 years ago. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:32 am by Timothy Powers O'Neill
ReDigi users also get coupons worth 20 cents for each song upload for sale, effectively reducing the cost of a track to 59 cents. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:32 am by Timothy Powers O'Neill
ReDigi users also get coupons worth 20 cents for each song upload for sale, effectively reducing the cost of a track to 59 cents. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:44 pm by Nathan Koppel
Soon, the Supreme Court should issue its ruling in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:29 am by Ad Law Defense
 However, it is worth noting that Coke recently settled – subject to preliminary and final court approval — a putative consumer class action, Niloofar Saeidian v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am by thelawprofessor
Certainly I can understand the disappointment of the bidder but several million dollars worth of damages? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 12:52 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri (Warner Bros Discovery) regarding the most recent instalment in the Lidl v Tesco IP dispute. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:20 pm by Kim Krawiec
By now most readers will have seen the article in Friday’s New York Times discussing Kamakahi v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:29 am by doug
That would be the Supreme Court case of Dewsnup v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:55 am by John Jascob
This "same price" test has been used by the Fifth and Seventh Circuits, but the Second Circuit declined to endorse in its opinion in this case (GAMCO Investors, Inc. v. [read post]