Search for: "York v. Morgan" Results 301 - 320 of 769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
The list included former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan and former People editor Neil Wallis. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:06 pm by Lynn McDonough
Supreme Court attempted to end the practice of states moving people with disabilities out of their communities and into isolated hospital facilities, holding in Olmstead v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:14 am
On the other hand, applying New York law in this instance, pursuant to the doctrine of primary assumption of risk, a participant "engaging in a sport or recreational activity... consents to those commonly appreciated risks which are inherent in and arise out of the nature of the sport generally and flow from such participation" (Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 484 [1997]; see Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432, 438-440 [1986]; Youmans… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Health, 275 F.3d 156, 167 (2d Cir.2001)); Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Health, 275 F.3d 156, 167 (2d Cir.2001)); Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
Morgan Hill Unified School District); A commercial speech tour-guide licensing case (Kagan v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am by Conor McEvily
  And at the New Yorker’s Daily Comment blog, Jeffrey Toobin discusses Fisher v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 The following is an excerpt from the May 2012 edition of the Alert: This month’s Alert discusses a Second Circuit opinion relying on Fait v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 The following is an excerpt from the May 2012 edition of the Alert: This month’s Alert discusses a Second Circuit opinion relying on Fait v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:41 am by Broc Romanek
Applying New York law, which governed the contract at issue, the Supreme Court clarified that a claim for breach of the implied covenant had to be based on different factual allegations than the contract breach claims, and could not be "duplicative of a breach of contract claim. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 4:20 am
So did the plaintiffs choose a California state court because of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in the Luther v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Grant
Olson-Gault agreed to appear via VTC Nov. 13, but Yaroshefsky filed a motion in the Southern District of New York to preemptively quash any possible forthcoming subpoena. [read post]