Search for: "Young v. Department Of Corrections" Results 301 - 320 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by admin
” It’s a fitting description for solitary confinement at Varner Super Maximum Security Unit in the Arkansas Department of Correction. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
As far as CGP is concerned, the Revenue relied on a Due Diligence report submitted by Ernst & Young in which it was stated that the parties had originally envisaged transferring Array Holdings Ltd. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:23 am by WSLL
Young, Faculty Director, Prosecution Assistance Program, Joshua B. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm by Julie Lam
Chief Justice Young and Justice Markman issued statements denying plaintiff’s motion seeking their respective disqualification in Parisi v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am by davidmginsberg
I am not trying to be “politically correct” but this Blog is read throughout the world, and I seek to avoid misunderstanding at the risk and cost of repetition and being non politically correct. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:17 am by Marty Schwimmer
’  A textbook 2(a) refusal would be if someone without authorization filed a trademark for, for example, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT or FBI. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Counsel's cross-examination of the mother and the wife, both clearly young victims of disturbing domestic violence, was at points tasteless and irrelevant, even prurient. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2486 (Admin) (03 October 2011) October 3, 2011 Mr Justice Silber in High Court: Refusal to amend 5 aspects of control order was lawful. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:54 am by Charon QC
  They didn’t get all the facts right if David Allen Green’s source is correct. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
Ohio There's the new murder protocol issued by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (Board) found a violation of the employee protection provision of the Wendell H. [read post]