Search for: "Young v. State of California" Results 301 - 320 of 1,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2023, 9:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
It is important to establish and enforce a strong, state-of-the-art anti-harassment policy. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Saira Mohamed
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:43 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
There are several thousand Risperdal Gynecomastia lawsuits pending in California state court. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
Those artistic renderings are indistinct, satirical representations of the style, look, and persona of a modern, beach-going young woman. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
  Instead, the state is using taxpayers' dollars to entice young, economically vulnerable women to experiment in this medically risky procedure. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
Young In Byun, who received a degree from Yuin in the second semester of 2002. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 4:18 pm
  Their advocacy raises questions far beyond this young girl's untimely death.Those questions are evidenced by the wealth of amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs filed by several groups, including the League of California Cities, the California State Association of Counties, NASCAR, the Sierra Club and 24 Hour Fitness health clubs supporting the position taken by the City of Santa Barbara. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:13 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
 New York State, unlike California, does not recognize that deceased individuals have a right to publicity and the bill would have provided such right. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 5:22 pm
As Bashman notes, the Oregon court held that the trial court properly refused Philip Morris's proposed punitive damages instruction, even though it correctly stated that the jury should not punish for harm to nonparties, because it also included some language that was erroneous under Oregon state law. [read post]