Search for: "B. R." Results 3181 - 3200 of 55,756
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2021, 3:13 pm by gA
Pero en el camino habremos perdido la unidad de régimen en el derecho común. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
  However, that does not entail preservation of all the elements of which the system consists: cf Secretary for Justice v Lau Kwok Fai & Anor[39]; applied in Catholic Diocese of Hong Kong v Secretary for Justice[40] ; (b) there is no challenge to the constitutionality of NSL 46(1); and (c) in view of: (i) the special status of the NSL as a national law enacted with a specific purpose of safeguarding national security; and (ii) the unambiguous wording… [read post]
22 May 2021, 5:14 am
“Those companies have had years and years of engineering and data and A-B testing of what evokes people writ large,” he added. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:07 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Kluwer IP Law interviewed Bühling on the occasion of the publication of the second edition of the book. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
” President Joseph R. [read post]
20 May 2021, 1:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:38 am by Shea Denning
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on May 4, 2021. [read post]
20 May 2021, 5:02 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Jens Adolphsen, Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Nationales und Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht und Sportrecht€ 199 Patents as an Incentive for Innovation by Rafal Sikorski, Zaneta Zemla-Pacud€ 136 [read post]
20 May 2021, 3:20 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
Jens Adolphsen, Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Nationales und Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht und Sportrecht€ 199 Patents as an Incentive for Innovation by Rafal Sikorski, Zaneta Zemla-Pacud€ 136 [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:02 am by JR Chaves
La sentencia del Juzgado de lo contencioso-administrativo de 8 de junio de 2020 ante la temporalidad abusiva que sufría la funcionaria interina recurrente, estimó la demanda y reconoció su derecho al reconocimiento de su condición de empleado público fijo y a permanecer en el puesto de trabajo que actualmente desempeña con los mismos derechos y con sujeción al mismo régimen de estabilidad e inamoviidad que rige para los funcionarios de… [read post]
19 May 2021, 11:49 pm by Eleonora Rosati
In the end, there is likely to be *a* waiver, with specific provisions about, inter alia (think of it as turning three knobs): (a) which rights are waived; (b) for which purpose and (c) for which period of time. [read post]
19 May 2021, 10:14 pm by Josh Blackman
" Section 171.208(b) lists the remedies permitted by this new cause of action: (b) If a claimant prevails in an action brought under this section, the court shall award: (1) injunctive relief sufficient to prevent the defendant from violating this subchapter or engaging in acts that aid or abet violations of this subchapter; (2) statutory damages in an amount of not less than $10,000 for each abortion that the defendant performed or induced in violation of this subchapter, and… [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:22 pm by Geoff Schweller
In a series of written answers to questions filed by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Gensler stated: “If confirmed to lead the SEC, I will build on the work of past Chairs to ensure continued strength in the whistleblower program. [read post]
19 May 2021, 11:21 am by Eugene Volokh
., if A posts something insulting about B that is likely to be read when the two are also "in close physical proximity" with each other). [read post]
19 May 2021, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
The Association québécoise de la production médiatique (AQPM) adopted a similar position in its brief, calling for the deletion of both user generated content provisions and expressly supporting the regulation of what it called “professional” user generated content, which as a recent article in the Toronto Star notes, could include thousands of Canadian Youtube, Tiktok, and Twitch creators who have been left in the dark about Bill C-10. [read post]
§ 3552(b)(2): (2)        The term “incident” means an occurrence that— (A)       actually or imminently jeopardizes, without lawful authority, the integrity, confidentiality, or availability of information or an information system; or (B)       constitutes a violation or imminent threat of violation of law, security policies, security procedures, or acceptable use… [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:22 pm by Josh Blackman
At that point, the district court can (a) agree that the federal court has jurisdiction or (b) remand the case to the state court. [read post]