Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 5,021
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In 2009, I wrote about Watkins v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In 2009, I wrote about Watkins v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
"Creat[ing]" an "outlaw" has a different sort of connotation than creating a law which makes conduct illegal -- and I take it that the Chief is relying on this distinction, but I'm not sure I understand what he means precisely. The Chief goes on to rely on New York v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
Justice Jackson's most famous opinion, I suspect, was his opinion for the Court in Wickard v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Blakely v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Blakely v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:14 am
This initial litigation led to a multiplicity of suits, now including the legal malpractice case Haberman v Xander Corp. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
Last Friday the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its anxiously-anticipated decision (pdf) in Eaton v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:34 am
Practice point: A motion for a preliminary injunction opens the record and gives the court authority to pass upon the sufficiency of the underlying pleading, but this power does not extend to an evaluation of conflicting evidence.Student note: The motion court may not, on its own initiative, convert a motion for a preliminary injunction into one for summary judgment without giving adequate notice to the parties and affording them an opportunity to lay bare their proof.Case: Alexandre… [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:48 pm
Stray f-bombs, bare skin Broadcast indecency rules Fair notice lacking Opinion: pdf html [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Hahn v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:43 am
Potvin v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:10 am
For example, if one reads recent decisions such as In re Bare Escentuals, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:54 pm
Appeals Court in 2010, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:40 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
