Search for: "California v. United States" Results 3181 - 3200 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2007, 3:04 pm
To us, the decision seemed contrary to the rule stated in Branick. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm by John J. Sullivan
 Last year it produced a terrific 9th Circuit opinion reinforcing that only the United States, not private plaintiffs, can enforce the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
United States for this blog, with other coverage coming from Ben Einhouse and Victor Pinedo at Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
Again, 1798.140(o)(2): Publicly available information is defined as “information that is lawfully made available from federal, state, or local government records, if any conditions associated with such information. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Jon Sands
United States-Montes-Ruiz, No. 12-50398 (Rawlinson with Gould and Lemelle (EDLA)) ---  In Setser v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am by Nabiha Syed
At the New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin discusses the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts on the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Handgun Control Federation of Ohio and Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 12:19 pm by Brian E. Spang
Runyon, Case No. 20-cv-02130-MMC, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, ruling that information alleged to be “secret” failed to qualify as a “trade secret” under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 2:19 pm by Unknown
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Cultural Resources)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlDuke S. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
  To the surprise of many, the United States’ amicus brief not only supported California but also urged that no private right of action exists for beneficiaries of federal spending programs (generally) to enforce federal standards against states. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:44 am by Susan Brenner
Dingman, supra (quoting United States v. [read post]