Search for: "Clinton v. Clinton" Results 3181 - 3200 of 3,308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2007, 12:22 pm
And, of course, we all know what happened in Clinton v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 9:59 am
To name a few: the Republican party’s desire to have a high profile candidate to go up against Obama or Clinton; the never-ending quest to keep September 11 at the forefront of voters’ minds; and the lack of a strong anti-choice candidate who has resonated with the voters (yet). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
The case under discussion today has the truly odd name of USA v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:39 am
Even in the Florida 2000 election case of Bush v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
”Clearly, the court wanted to ensure that these owners proceeded on the right course.For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use the following link: Goss v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:04 am
Evil laugh> from Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Ross Perot, IBM, NASA and the Rockefellers, among others in Tyler v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 7:32 am
He was the lead lawyer on Davis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:55 am
Answers that say "I wouldn't do so unilaterally because I believe in the Article V mechanism" will be disqualified for fighting the hypo. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 3:39 pm
The Supremes granted cert in Clinton v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:35 am
If, for example, Senator Clinton were to wear pajamas to a televised debate, one could fairly comment on her apparent failure to take the event seriously. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 10:11 pm
Fred Thompson] as someone we could work with" and gave to his campaigns, but they can't be pleased by his kind words for Texas malpractice-suit curbs [Washington Post, Lattman; disclaimer] Pace U. student arrested on hate crime charges after desecrating Koran stolen from college [Newsday; Volokh, more; Hitchens] Little-used Rhode Island law allows married person to act as spouse's attorney, which certainly has brought complications to the divorce of Daniel and Denise Chaput from… [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 9:21 pm
Again, it is not for the White House to say "what the law is," as we all learned reading Marbury v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 8:46 am
Might I suggest that sometimes a V-neck top is only a V-neck top? [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 12:17 am
" Givhan contrasted Clinton's decolletage with the more abundant display by Jacqui Smith, the new British home secretary, and her complaint seemed to be that Clinton was showing too little, too unassertively.Might I suggest that sometimes a V-neck top is only a V-neck top? [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 5:02 pm
Update [2007-7-21 20:31:2 by Big Tent Democrat]: KagroX v. [read post]