Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 48,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2021, 8:50 pm
Stylianos v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 1:29 pm
King v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:40 am
Adams v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 6:20 am
AquAlliance v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 6:13 am
Cornucopia Inst. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:32 am
Hardy v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
We just completed a five part series on Portnoy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
The Plaintiff's "request for attorney's fees and other costs is ... not academic, nor would it have been rendered academic even if the [Respondent] had eventually provided all of the materials sought (see Matter of Acme Bus Corp. v County of Suffolk, 136 AD3d 896; and 10. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
The Plaintiff's "request for attorney's fees and other costs is ... not academic, nor would it have been rendered academic even if the [Respondent] had eventually provided all of the materials sought (see Matter of Acme Bus Corp. v County of Suffolk, 136 AD3d 896; and 10. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm
Quinn is a bigger deal than Burwell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Canada will sign TPP trade deal, but ratification not certain https://t.co/ZuWiCeU105 -> Security for costs in a copyright case, Geophysical v Encana Corporation, 2016 ABQB 49 https://t.co/9LIHX1FNiN #canliidecisions #feedly -> Canadian Privacy Law Ontario court explicitly adopts new privacy tort: public disclosure of private facts https://t.co/0j9wvJGplT -> Vehicle data admitted in criminal case, R. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 8:15 pm
In Brayton Purcell LLP v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees based on its determination that Friedland already recouped all of his recoverable costs from other entities and therefore has no damages to recover in this case. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 6:16 pm
Kopp v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:55 pm
I have previously questioned the reasoning of Master Rowley, when dealing with the new proportionality test in May v Wavell Group, that: “The proportionate amount of costs must inevitably be smaller for a case which concludes early than one which reaches a final hearing. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Richard Clark v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 9:36 am
Foster v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:11 am
Council v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
[Ilya Shapiro and Aaron Barnes on Cato amicus brief in LMP Services v. [read post]
