Search for: "DONALD v. THE STATE" Results 3181 - 3200 of 4,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Eric M. Freedman
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
His old foe Donald Trump observed on social media: “They are throwing him out on the Monday Night Stage, known as Death Valley. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
Sep. 26, 2008)(per curiam) (condemnation appeal, State prevails)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:16 am by Dennis Aftergut
Courts use that standard to determine whether an affidavit justifies a search or seizure because there is probable cause to believe that the subject committed a crime.In Illinois v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
Attorney named Matthew Whitaker was named by President Donald Trump to be the chief of staff to former U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Ian Ayres
  An analogous dynamic is described in the famous Delaware Chancery case, Smith v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm by Lyle Denniston
The ruling in the case of Grady v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
The district court and First Circuit disagreed, citing United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
But now you know which school is Suburban State University, and that my home state is California--not just Sunny Desert State. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) A little over a year has passed since the Supreme Court’s momentous decision in NFIB v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am by Ilya Somin
Admittedly, the Supreme Court ruled that such sweeping congressional power was permissible in its badly flawed decision in Gonzales v. [read post]