Search for: "Doe 103" Results 3181 - 3200 of 3,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2007, 6:02 am
Kelton, 791 F.2d 101, 103 (8th Cir. 1986) (prisoner's Fourth Amendment rights were not violated when prison official inspected and copied prisoner's outgoing mail); Smith v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
Villamonte-Marquez, 462 U.S. 579, 588, 103 S.Ct. 2573, 77 L.Ed.2d 22 (1983). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:44 pm
The majority opinion does not conclude that the non-State Petitioners lacked standing. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
(c) Conditions for Patentability; Nonobvious Subject Matter- Section 103 is amended--(1) in subsection (a)--(A) by striking `A patent may not be obtained through the invention' and inserting `A patent for the claimed invention may not be obtained through the claimed invention';(B) by striking `sought to be patented' and inserting `of the claimed invention'; and(C) by striking `at the time the invention was made' and inserting `before the effective filing date of the… [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
This is absolutely true: it would make more false negatives than §103. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:31 pm
Currently, Kentucky law does only allows for a boyfriend or girlfriend to petition courts for a DVO if they live together or have a child in common. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Last month we examined some pre-Roman beginnings of modern admiralty doctrine, starting from pre-history through the Greek city states. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
The decision in White stands for the proposition that a person does not have an expectation of privacy regarding conversations held in his/her home with a third party. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:01 pm
Prerequisites: Academic Jargon and Gobbledygook 101, 102 & 103.Ideological Indoctrination and Demagoguery 101. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:38 am
(c) Conditions for Patentability; Nonobvious Subject Matter- Section 103 is amended--(1) in subsection (a)--(A) by striking `A patent may not be obtained through the invention' and inserting `A patent for the claimed invention may not be obtained through the claimed invention';(B) by striking `sought to be patented' and inserting `of the claimed invention'; and(C) by striking `at the time the invention was made' and inserting `before the effective filing date of the… [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 3:13 am
Ron Pair Enterprises, 489 U.S. 235, 241, 109 S.Ct. 1026, 103 L.Ed.2d 290(1989)). [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
If the submission does not state or identify a specific property, the submission is an application for a prequalification and not an application for a federally related mortgage loan under this part. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 8:38 am
  But it does illustrate how these new rules raise more questions than provide answers or clear guidelines. [read post]