Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 12,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
What does it mean by that? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
Chapter 1, governs almost all government contracts, including contracts with NASA. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:16 am
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, Jan. 29 at 1:00 pm: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will host an event on Russia’s Electronic Warfare Capabilities to 2025. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:00 pm
What does it mean by that? [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
The actual contribution does not lie solely in it being a computer program. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:00 am
And here’s the AdvoKat General’s Opinion.1. [read post]
2 May 2018, 10:00 pm
” 7 U.S.C. 1639(1). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:54 am
China’s Criminal Procedure Law does not allow an appeals court to increase the sentence when a defendant appeals. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:03 pm
1. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:43 pm
” 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(r). [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Many critics have pointed out that the conditionality does not go far enough. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:45 pm
[1] The figure is on page 323 of Climate Change 1995 The Science of Climate Change. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 3:07 am
Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: WYHA? [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 11:11 am
Tech teasers 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
The German legislator made use of this right and implemented section 52 b UrhG with effect of 1 January 2008. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:20 am
Mar. 29, 2012). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:06 pm
Id. at *1-2. [read post]
The parol evidence rule is not a rule of evidence, even though it governs admissibility of testimony
18 Nov 2014, 6:00 pm
Bailey, 580 S.W.2d 24, 29 (Tex.Civ.App. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:14 am
"The decision stresses on more than one occasion that the purpose of the Enforcement Directive is to ensure a high level of protection of intellectual property rights throughout the bloc.The ruling culminates in the following short-form answer to the Munich I Regional Court's question (this is now my translation):"Art. 9(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of April 29, 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights is to be… [read post]
