Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2011, 3:56 am
Reversing the Supreme Court’s ruling to the contrary, the Appellate Division, citing County of Rockland v Primiano Construction Co., 51 NY2d 1, held:Where the collective bargaining agreement does not contain an express provision making compliance with the time limitations set forth in the grievance procedure a condition precedent to binding arbitration, the issues related to compliance with the time limitations set forth in the grievance procedure are matters of… [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:28 pm
But I don't think it requires 51% of investors to sue the trustee for negligence, etc. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:32 pm
” In re Epic Holdings, Inc., 985 S.W.2d 41, 51 (Tex. 1998) (emphasis added) (citing Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
However, only one state, New Jersey, interpreted the existing Indian family exception as a distortion of ICWA and declined to adopt the exception.[1] Indiana adopted the existing Indian family doctrine in the 1988 case of In the Matter of Adoption of T.R.M.[2] The child, T.R.M., was born in Hot Springs, South Dakota to a mother who was a member of the Oglala Sioux Indian Tribe.[3] The paternity of the child was not established.[4] … [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
However, only one state, New Jersey, interpreted the existing Indian family exception as a distortion of ICWA and declined to adopt the exception.[1] Indiana adopted the existing Indian family doctrine in the 1988 case of In the Matter of Adoption of T.R.M.[2] The child, T.R.M., was born in Hot Springs, South Dakota to a mother who was a member of the Oglala Sioux Indian Tribe.[3] The paternity of the child was not established.[4] … [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:15 am
They have had to cover sick children since September; adults, however, have to wait until January 1, 2014—three long years away. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:27 am
Ornstein, 51 S.E.C. 135, 137 (1992); Depandrsquo;t of Enforcement v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:27 am
Ornstein, 51 S.E.C. 135, 137 (1992); Dep’t of Enforcement v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
Thoughtful deliberation does not occur and far too much gets lost in a tangle of obstruction and delay. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:32 pm
§ 106(1)-(3). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:19 am
” Trial Rule 51. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
The same rationale does not however, apply, in situations where the child, who, on attaining adulthood , moves the Court for a declaration to determine his/her parentage, as in this case. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:23 pm
The number of ill people identified in each state with the outbreak strain is as follows: California (1), Connecticut (1), District of Columbia (1), Georgia (1), Hawaii (1), Iowa (1), Illinois (51), Indiana (9), Massachusetts (1), Missouri (17), New York (1), Pennsylvania (2), South Dakota (1), Tennessee (1), Texas (1), Virginia (1), and Wisconsin (3). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:23 pm
The number of ill people identified in each state with the outbreak strain is as follows: California (1), Connecticut (1), District of Columbia (1), Georgia (1), Hawaii (1), Iowa (1), Illinois (51), Indiana (9), Massachusetts (1), Missouri (17), New York (1), Pennsylvania (2), South Dakota (1), Tennessee (1), Texas (1), Virginia (1), and Wisconsin (3). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
Another well publicized creative structure occurred in the acquisition of a 51% stake in TSX-listed Uranium One by Russia’s ARMZ, which included an asset “vend-in” by ARMZ involving that company’s stake in two Kazakh uranium mines. 4. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:28 pm
P. 51(d)(2). [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
See Air Transport Ass’n, 291 F.3d at 51 n.1 (stating that “[t]he substance of the rules in Parts 121 and 135 is essentially the same and the rules are likewise interpreted”). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:41 pm
If there are no dependent children, the surviving spouse receives 51% of the AWW. [read post]
